Showing posts with label independence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label independence. Show all posts
Thursday, June 21, 2007
The Consequence of Sarko
Quick link to this thoughtful piece on the possibility and desirability of an independent media in Sarkozy's France - thoughtful primarily for recognising that the desirable level of media independence is not always the maximum level.
Monday, May 28, 2007
Polls on CBC's independence
No sooner do I complete my June paper (a 15,000 word research design for the thesis), than I find a new data point on perceptions of political independence by the Friends of Canadian Broadcasting.
The first poll is by Ipsos-Reid, and asks
The poll is poorly worded, since the options are not mutually exhaustive. One might think CBC is independent, but it still matters who appoints the Board of Directors. (It reminds me of the get-out-the-vote campaign in West Wing, Season 4, where will changes one kid's sign from "It doesn't matter who you vote for, make sure you vote", to "No matter who you vote for, make sure you vote").
A similar question was asked in 1999 by a different polling group (Compass); at 35%, the percentage replying "independent" was much lower.
The first poll is by Ipsos-Reid, and asks
Thinking specifically about the CBC...which of the following two statements is closer to your own opinion?
Statement | May. 04 | Aug. 02 |
The Prime Minister’s power to appoint the CBC President and Board of Directors gives the government too much influence over the nature and content of programs broadcast on the CBC | 45 | 46 |
The CBC is independent and it doesn’t matter who appoints the Board of Directors and President | 52 | 50 |
Don't know/no opinion | 3 | 5 |
The poll is poorly worded, since the options are not mutually exhaustive. One might think CBC is independent, but it still matters who appoints the Board of Directors. (It reminds me of the get-out-the-vote campaign in West Wing, Season 4, where will changes one kid's sign from "It doesn't matter who you vote for, make sure you vote", to "No matter who you vote for, make sure you vote").
A similar question was asked in 1999 by a different polling group (Compass); at 35%, the percentage replying "independent" was much lower.
Labels:
CBC,
independence,
public opinion,
public service broadcasting
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Public attitudes towards Rai
In my thesis, I claimed that "there is no available polling evidence on whether Italians believe Rai to be independent of the government". That's not quite right. There's no public polling data, but I've hit the jackpot through trawling through the catalogue of the Servizio Bibliotecario Nazionale: I've got Rai's own internal data.
Granted, it's from 1986. But still, it's tremendously useful. I don't know why the Fondazione Gramsci and the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi have copies, but I'm very glad they do.
They key data - on spontaneous and prompted responses to judgements on Rai - are as one might expect:
So, Italian citizens judged [quite correctly in my view], that Rai was a political organisation; that it was controlled by an agreement between some parties, and not per se by the government or the entire political class. Let's take "outside of politics" as being equivalent to "independent from politics". If that's the case, then the 4.1% of Italians who judge Rai to be politically independent is much less than the 22% of Britons who judge the BBC to be politically independent.
Granted, it's from 1986. But still, it's tremendously useful. I don't know why the Fondazione Gramsci and the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi have copies, but I'm very glad they do.
They key data - on spontaneous and prompted responses to judgements on Rai - are as one might expect:
- Rai is "an instrument in the hands of the leading class" [unprompted response]: 9.3%, a marked increase over the past ten years
- Rai is "an organisation controlled by a few political parties" [prompted category]: 41.9%, five points down from ten years before;
- Rai is "an organisation of the government" [prompted category]: 24.6%, five points down from ten years before;
- Rai is "an organisation controlled by all the political parties": 20.4%, two and a half points up from 1979, or before the birth of RaiTre
- Rai is "an organisation outside of politics": 4.1%, a marginal increase over ten years previously
So, Italian citizens judged [quite correctly in my view], that Rai was a political organisation; that it was controlled by an agreement between some parties, and not per se by the government or the entire political class. Let's take "outside of politics" as being equivalent to "independent from politics". If that's the case, then the 4.1% of Italians who judge Rai to be politically independent is much less than the 22% of Britons who judge the BBC to be politically independent.
Labels:
independence,
public opinion,
public service broadcasting,
rai
Sunday, April 15, 2007
More on the independence of French journalists
Even better data from this 2003 CSA / Marianne poll on l'image des journalistes: 23% of French people think the media are independent of "political power", Patrick Poivre d'Arvor, Jean-Pierre Pernaud, and Claire Chazal are cited as particularly independent. Cross-tabs are included!
Journalistic independence in France
Via a long chain of googling too tedious to repeat, I find a wonderful poll on public attitudes towards French journalists. My interest was drawn to the question on public perceptions of journalistic independence. Two questions are asked, one on independence from political parties, and one on independence from economic concerns. Here's the time-series on independence from political parties. Only one third of French people believe journalists are independent.
Unfortunately, the question wasn't asked for different channels, so there's no direct way of telling whether journalists from France Televisions are judged less independent, say, than journalists from TF1. (One could run cross-tabs on main channel watched and perceptions of independence, but the link would be tenuous).
In general, the news isn't good for France Televisions: whilst in 1989, 43% of respondents cited either France 2 or France 3 as their most trusted source of television information, compared to 33% who said the same of TF1, the gap has now swung in TF1's favour, with 41% citing it as their most trusted source, compared to the joint total of 35% for France 2 and 3, with the latter gaining impressively.
Rappel enquête SOFRES | Déc 2001 | ||||||||
nov 1993 | déc 1994 | déc 1995 | déc 1996 | déc 1997 | déc 1998 | déc 1999 | déc 2000 | ||
From political parties and the powerful | |||||||||
Yes, they're independent No, they're not independent Wouldn't say | 32 56 12
| 33 55 12 | 28 62 10 | 30 59 11 | 27 64 9 | 32 59 9 | 28 60 12 | 32 59 9 | 33 55 12 |
Unfortunately, the question wasn't asked for different channels, so there's no direct way of telling whether journalists from France Televisions are judged less independent, say, than journalists from TF1. (One could run cross-tabs on main channel watched and perceptions of independence, but the link would be tenuous).
In general, the news isn't good for France Televisions: whilst in 1989, 43% of respondents cited either France 2 or France 3 as their most trusted source of television information, compared to 33% who said the same of TF1, the gap has now swung in TF1's favour, with 41% citing it as their most trusted source, compared to the joint total of 35% for France 2 and 3, with the latter gaining impressively.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)