- what's the average wage for a journalist?
- what's the average wage for a journalist working in the public service broadcaster?
- is there a trade magazine in journalism or communications?
- is there some magazine or annual agenda which shows the editors of the various television news desks? (Like Benn's Media in the UK, except better; more like Agenda del Giornalista in Italy)
- have there been any surveys of journalists?
- are the names of television news editors ever mentioned in the non-specialist press? Would someone interested in politics know them?
- are the names of television executives followed by party labels in brackets? Would someone interested in politics know these affiliations?
- How does one become a journalist for the public service broadcaster?
- Where did the first PSB journalists come from?
- Were the first PSB news broadcasts produced in-house, or did they rely on wire-services (AP, Reuters, TT, etc.,)?
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
Things I would like to find out
For any country,
Thursday, June 21, 2007
The Consequence of Sarko
Quick link to this thoughtful piece on the possibility and desirability of an independent media in Sarkozy's France - thoughtful primarily for recognising that the desirable level of media independence is not always the maximum level.
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
CBC President parody video taken down by House of Commons
[Via Boing-Boing] The Canadian House of Commons asked YouTube to take down a parody video of Robert Rabinovitch's testimony to the House. Questions:
- why can't Canadian citizens get the rights to the video of their own representatives?
- what on earth did Rabinovitch say that might have been worth parodying?
Monday, May 28, 2007
Description of SVT's governance
Establishment of public broadcasters by charters has its upsides and its downsides.
Upsides: it maintains the independence of the broadcaster.
Downsides: I have to read through Sweden's 1996 Television and Radio Law, the 2007 Licence Agreement, and the Supplement to the Licence Agreement, before finding that none of them contain anything on the governance of SVT.
Thankfully, this document contains information on SVT's governance, including: how the independent foundation members are appointed; how they further appoint the executive board members, and their tenure.
Upsides: it maintains the independence of the broadcaster.
Downsides: I have to read through Sweden's 1996 Television and Radio Law, the 2007 Licence Agreement, and the Supplement to the Licence Agreement, before finding that none of them contain anything on the governance of SVT.
Thankfully, this document contains information on SVT's governance, including: how the independent foundation members are appointed; how they further appoint the executive board members, and their tenure.
Polls on CBC's independence
No sooner do I complete my June paper (a 15,000 word research design for the thesis), than I find a new data point on perceptions of political independence by the Friends of Canadian Broadcasting.
The first poll is by Ipsos-Reid, and asks
The poll is poorly worded, since the options are not mutually exhaustive. One might think CBC is independent, but it still matters who appoints the Board of Directors. (It reminds me of the get-out-the-vote campaign in West Wing, Season 4, where will changes one kid's sign from "It doesn't matter who you vote for, make sure you vote", to "No matter who you vote for, make sure you vote").
A similar question was asked in 1999 by a different polling group (Compass); at 35%, the percentage replying "independent" was much lower.
The first poll is by Ipsos-Reid, and asks
Thinking specifically about the CBC...which of the following two statements is closer to your own opinion?
| Statement | May. 04 | Aug. 02 |
| The Prime Minister’s power to appoint the CBC President and Board of Directors gives the government too much influence over the nature and content of programs broadcast on the CBC | 45 | 46 |
| The CBC is independent and it doesn’t matter who appoints the Board of Directors and President | 52 | 50 |
| Don't know/no opinion | 3 | 5 |
The poll is poorly worded, since the options are not mutually exhaustive. One might think CBC is independent, but it still matters who appoints the Board of Directors. (It reminds me of the get-out-the-vote campaign in West Wing, Season 4, where will changes one kid's sign from "It doesn't matter who you vote for, make sure you vote", to "No matter who you vote for, make sure you vote").
A similar question was asked in 1999 by a different polling group (Compass); at 35%, the percentage replying "independent" was much lower.
Labels:
CBC,
independence,
public opinion,
public service broadcasting
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Greek PSB governance
I've been hunting for an English language description of the governance of the Greek PSB for a while now. I've found part of it:
and
This is from Georgia Chondroleou, "Policy networks in comparative perspective: media policy networks in Britain and Greece", presented at the ECPR 2001 conference.
The government introduced the broadcasting Law 230/1975 which abolished EIRT and, in its place, created Hellenic Radio and Television (ERT). ERT was a limited company whose only shareholder was the Greek state. It is characteristic that when the Bill was discussed in Parliament no party questioned either the state monopoly or the dominating role of the state over ERT (Alivisatos, 1986). The Law ensured tight governmental control of ERT and concentrated most effective power in the hands of the Director-General. The Director-General and the two assistant Directors-Generals were directly appointed (and dismissed) by the government. The Board of Governors, which had no real powers, was to be appointed following the decision of the Council of Ministers. The Director-General, who has autocratic power over ERT, is himself/herself at the absolute mercy of the government since his/her appointment (and dismissal) is a matter of 'political will' of the government. Clearly television was to be used neither as a 'public watchdog' nor for the development of a pluralist dialogue. It was, on the contrary, to be used to support the government of the day and its policies.
and
The Directors-General and directors of ERT were appointed and dismissed with great frequency, mainly because they ‘failed’ to cover adequately government’s policies. Between 1981 and 1989, for instance, there were thirteen chairmen and Directors-General and sixteen news-directors with an average term in office of about eight months.
This is from Georgia Chondroleou, "Policy networks in comparative perspective: media policy networks in Britain and Greece", presented at the ECPR 2001 conference.
Bibliography on broadcasting in Slovakia
- Godarsky, Ivan, "Slovakia: Facing Reality", Transitions Online, 9th January 2006
- Milton, A.K, "Bound But Not Gagged: Media Reform in Democratic Transitions", Comparative Political Studies, Vo. 34, No. 5, pp. 493-526
- Pavlik, Petr, and Shields, Peter, "Toward an Explanation of Television Broadcast Restructuring in the Czech Republic", European Journal of Communication, Vol. 14, No. 4 (criticises the theory of limited change, noting purges of nomenklatura in broadcasting before the split; and international help in drafting of media legislation (p. 497))
- Metykova, Monika, Regulating Public Service Broadcasting: the cases of the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Ireland, PhD thesis, Masaryk University Brno; especially Ch. 4
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
